Tuesday 14 March 2017

Test Cricket and its future

The first Test match was played in 1877 in Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG), nearly a hundred years senior to the One-Day Internationals (ODIs). The test cricket, over the years, has faced many ups and downs. Nevertheless, it has survived till present times. However, of-late there has been growing concern over the future of test cricket in light of the dwindling viewers in test matches.

The reasons for the above are not very difficult to decipher. These include the growing interest in the ODIs and the recent surge of T20 internationals, especially the Indian Premier League (IPL), Big Bash League (BBL) and so on. The growth of limited overs cricket has resulted in the mismatch of rewards. While, on one hand, such high-intensity T20 matches provides greater rewards to the T20 specialists, the test cricket, on the other hand, is surviving mainly because of its inherent strength. This is because test cricket is indeed a real "test" of skills, techniques, patience which are enjoyed by the classical batsmen and bowlers of modern times.

But, as experts believe, the future of test cricket can be at stake if it remains dependent solely on the beauty of the game and do not take some immediate actions either in the form of increasing the remuneration or finding other ways out.

Well, optimism is still prevailing around in view of the steps contemplated by the the International Cricket Council (ICC), the international governing body of cricket and also some of the national boards. For instance, a well-thought out strategy has been to conduct a World Test Championship. However, the clouds of doubts are still hovering over this decision and any concrete plan is yet to be made. The sooner the decision is made, the better it will be for the test cricket. The reason is that this is a good step as the recognised test teams will make an effort to be in the top four (the top four test teams vis-a-vis a certain cut-off date will play the championship). This is expected to promote test cricket and may also enhance viewership.

The ICC, with a similar aim, had also thought of the Two-Tier system in test cricket. Barring aside the technical details, this system would have helped in grouping of teams in two categories, who would play among themselves certain number of test matches. However, this has not found support from Indian, Bangladesh and the Sri Lankan Cricket Board because the system would not allow the low ranked teams to play with the high ranked teams. This, according to Bangladesh Cricket Board, would have defeated the purpose of improving the low-ranked teams performance in test cricket.

This system has been worked upon and a new idea has been doing rounds whereby the winner of the first group would play with the winner of the other group. This is an improvement and is expected to dilute the loopholes in the two-tier system. But, this view is yet to see the light of the day.

In this direction, the BCCI has also contributed by increasing the remuneration of Indian players per match to 15 lakhs. This will, hopefully, retain the interests of players in test cricket, especially among the young generations. However, this has not yet become a norm among other cricket boards might be because of lack of financial strength. But, sooner or later, this is a necessary evil for test cricket.

At the same time, as pointed out by Rahul Dravid, former cricketer, scheduling of test matches should also be given more priority i.e more test matches be scheduled in a year. At present, the presence of ODIs and T20s in the scheduled list of matches have increased and is one of the reasons of declining interest both among the viewers and the players vis-a-vis test cricket.

Well, in my opinion, whatever steps are taken, one important aspect to keep in mind is that test cricket should be competitive enough to generate interest. This is because viewers should feel the same heat and excitement as are witnessed in T20s and ODIs. The question, however, is- how to do this?

Keeping in mind the recent test matches, including the ongoing India-Australia test series, I think a fair competition between bat and ball has a greater probability to generate the required thrill. This also has a greater chance of providing a result, an important indicator to make test matches more popular and interesting.

In addition to this, more test matches can be conducted under the floodlights to provide the audience a better feel of the game as it is there in the limited overs game. Other innovative measures such as usage of the pink ball can be adopted in some of the matches. These small changes might help in reducing the monotony that is generally associated with the test cricket.

11 comments:

Amit ranjan said...

Nicely written!

Test cricket in Australia, england and south africa attracts lots of audience, other test playing nations should learn from these countries in terms of quality of services provided at the stadiums and overall aesthetics of the game which seems to be much better in these countries.
And in case of india the lopsided effects of the toss on result of the game should be neutralised.

Nityanand Jha said...

Thank You @Amit Ranjan for reading my article. Your suggestions are valid.

GITESH KUMAR said...

Well written Nitya!!

The core point why people are losing interest in watching the test match in stadium is that test match keeps going on for five days.So one way may be to reduce the number of days and also altering few rules so that a result other than draw can be generated.

Also day night format and to negate the effect of dew we can play in big indoor stadiums..

Smita Jha said...

The frequency of draws have declined noticeably in the last 15 years. This could be due to several changes brought about in the style of the game coupled with few rule changes in test cricket. Whereas few people believe it to be good for the game, a contrary argument advanced suggests that the matches are finishing off excessively early making the game more predictable. This in a way is hampering the spirit of the game. Therefore, a right balance has to be struck between increasing viewership through generation of interest and maintaining the sanctity of the oldest and purest form of cricket.

Smita Jha said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
News Analyzer said...

Enjoyed reading dear Nityanand!!
I'm also a cricket lover and AB DE VILLIERS is one of my favourite.
For me Test match gives psychological boost to its audience like- bright white uniform-reaffirms cricket is a 'gentleman's game'. Ball- bat contact sound is finest in test match only. With changing time publicity of this format is needed. With HD broadcasting, live score updates and meaningful discussions have revived the interest a bit more in the segment.

Blogger_434 said...

Great article to celebrate the anniversary of test cricket. Reminds me of harsha bhogle!

unknown said...

intrestingly today i got to know first officialy reocgnised test match began on 15 march.So is this a coincidence?? o.O

Nityanand Jha said...

Hi. Yes this might be a coincidence :) Thank you so much for giving me your precious time.

Nityanand Jha said...

@Shivansh Awasthi: Thank You so much for reading my article.

unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.